House V. NCAA settlement doesn't settle everything
Digest more
BYU’s new guard has said NIL was not the driving factor in his decision to transfer. Even if that isn’t the case, Drew hopes the House vs. NCAA settlement — which was recently approved and will soon allow programs to share revenue with athletes under a $20.5 million salary cap —will bring new balance to offseasons.
As colleges prepare for sweeping changes tied to the NCAA's $2.8 billion NIL settlement, proposed scholarship and roster limits will dampen college opportunities for high school athletes.
Starting July 1, athletic departments will be able to compensate athletes directly from their revenues. Here's how the settlement of House v. NCAA will impact NCAA Division I schools.
Welcome to the end of amateurism—and the chaotic beginning of whatever comes next. In the wake of a landmark antitrust settlement, House v. NCAA, the college
The College Sports Commission is designed to regulate the NIL market but won’t have subpoena power to control rogue boosters.
The push from the NCAA and Power Five conferences to enact federal legislation regarding college sports is intensifying. House representatives Lisa McClain (R-Mich.)and Janelle Bynum (D-Ore.) introduced the “College Student-Athlete Protections and Opportunities through Rights,
Nearly all of the $20.5 million that Ohio State is allowed to share with athletes in the next academic year will be through NIL payments.
The $14 million NIL plan in Chapel Hill may face sharp limits under the NCAA’s new revenue-sharing cap, and UNC must now make every dollar count.